In this publish, I’d like to think about the following argument with you:
- Humans love success and winners.
- One widespread critique of Christianity is that it’s a man-made religion.
- If Christianity is a man-made faith, it ought to promote success and winners.
- However the Christian God repeatedly appears to fail and value failures.
- Subsequently, to the diploma these premises are true, it is much less probably that Christianity is a human invention.
Our Love For Success
Do you’re keen on losers? Or is it more fun to root for the winner?
Past a primary loyalty to ourselves and our own favourite groups, we get pleasure from cheering for the champion – or laughing at an unfortunate washout.
For example, take the extremely well-liked reality present American Idol. Every season, viewers rallied round probably the most gifted people, forming teams to mobilize help and raise their favorite performer to victory. At the similar time, early rounds of the show featured Simon Cowell mercilessly criticizing the weakest contestants. Whether you did nicely or not, the present’s judges effectively turned the performers into something entertaining to observe.
On a extra private degree, lately a pal shared that his regular follow is to ship out updates about his successes, but to avoid mentioning his failures. Think about your personal social media accounts: are they crammed with a document of your insecurities, errors, and embarrassing moments?
Or think about how elemental biological forces have shaped our impulse to win. As the Encyclopaedia Britannica explains:
In his concept of natural selection… Charles Darwin prompt that “survival of the fittest” was the idea for natural evolution (the change of dwelling things with time).
This primary impulse to glorify the ‘faster, higher, stronger’ is in all places you look. From The Olympics, The World Cup, and The World Collection to the Academy Awards, The Emmys, and The Golden Globes, we reside in a world that loves the primary, the most effective, and the best.
So is it any shock that this similar impulse is revealed in faith? Think about, as one instance, the ancient preamble to the Code of Hammurabai:
When Anu the Chic, King of the Anunaki, and Bel, the lord of Heaven and earth, who decreed the destiny of the land, assigned to Marduk, the over-ruling son of Ea, God of righteousness, dominion over earthly man, and made him nice among the many Igigi, they referred to as Babylon by his illustrious identify, made it nice on earth, and based an everlasting kingdom in it, whose foundations are laid so solidly as those of heaven and earth; then Anu and Bel referred to as by identify me, Hammurabi, the exalted prince, who feared God, to deliver concerning the rule of righteousness in the land, to destroy the wicked and the evil-doers; so that the robust shouldn’t harm the weak; so that I ought to rule over the black-headed individuals like Shamash, and enlighten the land, to additional the well-being of mankind.
Or in Islam, the Qur’an repeatedly honors Allah as the greatest God:
Certainly, Allah is Pardoning and Forgiving. That’s because Allah causes the night time to enter the day and causes the day to enter the night time and because Allah is Listening to and Seeing. That is because Allah is the Fact, and that which they name upon aside from Him is falsehood, and because Allah is the Most Excessive, the Grand.
While examples could possibly be simply multiplied, it seems that the human species shares a strong, even primal, want for fulfillment and greatness. As Cicero said, “Ambition is a universal factor in life, and the nobler a man is, the more susceptible he is to the sweets of fame.”
Faith As A Human Invention
One well-liked objection to Christianity is that it is, like all religions, merely a human invention. For example, here’s how Dr. Stanley Fish, writing in The New York Occasions, explains the case:
Is Religion Man-Made?
Positive it is. Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens assume that this reality about faith is enough to invalidate its claims…
So there’s the triple-pronged case. Religions are humanly constructed traditions and at their middle are corrupted texts that have been cobbled together by provincial, ignorant men who knew less concerning the world than any high-school teenager alive at this time. Sounds devastating, but once you get proper right down to it, all it amounts to is the assertion that God didn’t write the books or establish the phrases of worship, men did, and that the outcomes are (to put it charitably) lower than good.
However that is precisely what you’d anticipate. It’s God (if there’s one) who is ideal and infinite; men are finite and confined inside historical views.
On this point, Dawkins, Fish, Harris, and Hitchens are following within the footsteps of Sigmund Freud, who famously wrote these strains:
The PhilosophyOfReligion.information website has a nice abstract of this argument:
The concept that religion is just not something instituted by God, however relatively is man-made, might be traced back to historic Greece. It was not until the 18th Century, nevertheless, that it started to look attainable to finally show what had previous been mere speculation. Ludwig Feuerbach, drawing on Hegelian philosophy, set out the concept the method by which faith was invented was wish-fulfilment. God, based on Feuerbach, is projection is the strongest wishes of humanity…To know God, on this view, one must perceive human psychology; as Feuerbach put it, “theology is anthropology”.
At this point, an intermediate conclusion is definitely accessible:
- On an anthropological and psychological degree, people love success.
- The concept of ‘God’ is a projection of humanity’s strongest wishes.
- Subsequently, religions ought to glorify their god or gods.
But while Christianity undoubtedly and rightly portrays the Triune God of love as the greatest of all gods, it does so in a very uncommon manner.
The Seeming Failures of the Christian God
From the primary pages of the Scriptures, the Christian worldview is marked with a conundrum. God has created a world that’s “good” in each approach; with the creation of mankind, it is declared “very good” (Genesis 1:31). However just a few verses later, Adam and Eve have turned towards God, and as a consequence, “the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden” (Genesis three:23).
The next occasion? After Adam and Eve welcome their two youngsters, Cain and Abel, their lives experience more misfortune: “Cain rose up against his brother Abel and killed him” (Genesis four:8). By Genesis 6, the challenge has gone so badly that God tells Noah, “I have determined to make an end of all flesh, for the earth is filled with violence through them.”
The Previous Testomony
All through the Previous Testomony, God seeks to enable his individuals to do what is sweet and proper. However every time, the trouble falls brief.
As an example, think about the state of affairs immediately after God has delivered the Israelites out of Egypt with ten stupendous judgments towards Pharaoh’s household and the Egyptians, followed by the miraculous crossing of the Purple Sea. Moses goes up onto Mt. Sinai (Exodus 24:17-18):
Now the looks of the glory of the LORD was like a devouring hearth on the highest of the mountain in the sight of the individuals of Israel. Moses entered the cloud and went up on the mountain. And Moses was on the mountain forty days and forty nights.
In the aftermath of such great miracles, and in the presence of the Lord, how do the Israelites respond? In Exodus 32:1 we learn:
When the individuals saw that Moses delayed to return down from the mountain, the individuals gathered themselves collectively to Aaron and stated to him, “Up, make us gods who shall go before us. As for this Moses, the man who brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we do not know what has become of him.”
This builds an unimaginable pressure by means of the historic document. God is loving, powerful, all-knowing, yet His individuals are forgetful, wayward, and rebellious. It doesn’t matter what miracles God does, or how spectacular his deliverance, his individuals proceed to turn away from him.
The contrast becomes so nice that the prophet Hosea known as by God with this unusual message: “And the LORD said to me, “Go again, love a woman who is loved by another man and is an adulteress, even as the LORD loves the children of Israel, though they turn to other gods and love cakes of raisins” (Hosea three:1).
This is, to put it mildly, an unusual portrayal of the divine. It’s uncommon to seek out admiration and praise for a man whose spouse is repeatedly untrue to him. Yet God intentionally and dramatically asks us to search for the similarities.
The New Testament
Within the life of Jesus, the resolution of this Previous Testomony rigidity is paradoxical in the excessive. The Creator God of the universe, the King of all kings and the Lord of all Lords, the Simply and Righteous Ruler, the forgiving and compassionate God of mercy, who knows all, utterly humbles himself by turning into certainly one of us.
Not solely does Jesus develop into human, however as many have famous, he arrives within the helplessness that’s characteristic of an infant. His life is threatened by governmental persecution, driving his family into refugee status in Egypt. In his public ministry, he habitually and pointedly associates himself with tax collectors, ladies, the sick, and the poor. In a supremely ironic approach, He’s opposed and pursued to demise by a spiritual institution that has memorized the Previous Testomony.
From a theological viewpoint, the writers of the New Testament come to the shocking conclusion that Jesus’ demise was extra than simply particular person, familial, social, and non secular humiliation, but that Jesus turned the sacrificial offering for all human sin. As Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 5:21, “he made him to be sin who knew no sin.”
As Tim O’Neill, an atheist, succinctly explains (within the context of discussing the historicity of Jesus’ existence):
However in all probability one of the best instance of a component within the story which was so awkward for the early Christians that it merely needs to be historical is the crucifixion. The concept of a Messiah who dies was totally remarkable and completely alien to any Jewish tradition prior to the beginning of Christianity, but the concept of a Messiah who was crucified was not solely weird, it was absurd. Based on Jewish tradition, anyone who was “hanged on a tree” was to be thought-about accursed by Yahweh and this was one of the reasons crucifixion was thought-about notably abhorrent to Jews. The idea of a crucified Messiah, subsequently, was completely weird and absurd.
It was equally weird to non-Jews. Crucifixion was thought-about probably the most shameful of deaths, so much in order that one of many privileges of Roman citizenship is that citizens might never be crucified. The concept of a crucified god, subsequently, was unthinkable. This was a lot the case that the early Christians prevented any depictions of Jesus on the cross – the primary depictions of the Crucifixion seem in the Fourth Century, after Christian emperors banned crucifixion and it started to lose its stigma. It’s vital that the earliest depiction of the crucifixion of Jesus that we’ve is a graffito from Rome displaying a man worshipping a crucified figure with the top of a donkey with the mocking caption “Alexamenos worships his god”. The concept of a crucified god was, fairly literally, ridiculous. Paul acknowledges how absurd the thought of a crucified Messiah was in 1 Corinthians 1:23, the place he says it “is a stumbling block to the Jews and an absurdity to the gentiles”.
Yet however, it’s this divine descent into service and struggling that turns into a hymn of Christian reward (Philippians 2:5-11):
Have this mind amongst yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, although he was within the type of God, did not rely equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the type of a servant, being born within the likeness of males. And being found in human type, he humbled himself by turning into obedient to the purpose of dying, even demise on a cross.
Subsequently God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the identify that is above each identify, so that on the identify of Jesus each knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and underneath the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
An Unlikely Invention
Some critics of Christianity have noted this central function — and despised it. In addition to the Roman graffiti that Tim O’Neill mentions, think about Nietzsche’s scathing phrases:
Christianity has taken the part of all of the weak, the low, the botched; it has made a really perfect out of antagonism to all of the self-preservative instincts of sound life; it has corrupted even the schools of these natures which are intellectually most vigorous, by representing the very best intellectual values as sinful, as misleading, as filled with temptation.
In fact, if it is true that the weak, the low, and the botched managed efficiently to subvert the spiritual and political elite that wrote and maintained the Previous and New Testaments for over 1,500 years, then this is itself a miracle in need of rationalization.
In a world that is typically ruled by the highly effective, formidable, and wealthy, it is exceptional that the God of the Bible is portrayed as loving the weak and powerless, to the purpose of turning into weak and powerless Himself.
I feel this argument is at greatest a suggestive one. All I can say is that this: the more I mirror on the common human fascination of (and want for) success, and the more I understand how utterly the Triune God of affection was prepared to appear to be a failure in His quest to love and redeem us, the less and fewer possible it seems to me that Christianity is a man-made faith.
It is a humbling conclusion, because when thought-about correctly, these thoughts can’t solely convince your mind. They need to also humble your spirit, and ultimately, offer you an eager want to imitate the sacrificial, servant-hearted love of God.